Quantcast
Channel: Film School Rejects
Viewing all 22121 articles
Browse latest View live

Eli Roth’s Upcoming Disaster Movie, ‘Aftershock,’ Creates Bidding War

$
0
0

Unless you happen to be from Chile, you might not have ever heard of director Nicolas Lopez. But chances are you soon will. After creating the top grossing Chilean films in both 2010 and 2011 with Que Pena Tu Vida and Que Pena Tu Boda, the director is next moving on to helm Aftershock, the newest film from Eli Roth.

This one is a disaster movie that Roth and Lopez wrote together, and that Roth will be starring in. Apparently the idea for the film came to Lopez after his country was hit with a pretty bad earthquake back in 2010, but it’s got some of Roth’s horror sensibility in there as well. The story is largely about dangerous patients that escape an insane asylum after the quake. If horror fans have any sort of issue with getting some Lopez mixed in with their Roth, then maybe this awesome quote from the director will assuage your fears: “I was a fan of Cabin Fever and Hostel, and I love that we’re mixing our sensibility. People will be shocked when they see this movie. It’s nothing that you could expect. I want this to be my Robocop.” Anybody who doesn’t think their career is complete until they’ve made their Robocop is okay with me.

Roth thinks he’s pretty okay too. When talking about his collaborator he said, “He has the incredible combination of commercial sensibility with an artistic eye, and what he has done here in Chile with their film industry is revolutionary,” then added, “This collaboration marks the beginning of what we call Chilewood, making genre films for the global market using all the resources Chile has to offer.”

And it sounds like their plan to turn Chile into a hotbed of genre filmmaking is already off to a good start, because even at only four weeks into its production, Aftershock is already being sought out by several Hollywood studios. Reports say that names like The Weinstein Company and Relativity Media are currently involved in a bidding war to get the rights to this one, with the final deal likely to get made in Berlin.

Oh yeah, one more thing Disney fans…this movie also has a Selena Gomez cameo! Squee! [Deadline Putre]


Sundance 2012: Experience the Interactive Storytelling of ‘Bear 71′ With New Video

$
0
0

As mentioned in my interview with Franz the Bear, this year’s Sundance Film Festival not only featured films, documentaries, shorts, and memorable performances from established talent (John Hawkes) to breakout stars (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), it also brought an interactive element to Park City, UT. Bear 71 explored the line between technology and nature by looking to not only show people a documentary, but actually bring them into the experience. This was achieved through an interactive installation at the New Frontier that ran during the festival and not only utilized film and pictures, but also combined the use of webcams and social media to bring viewers into the world of Bear 71.

Bridging that gap between the standard practice of being told and shown something through a film, Bear 71 allowed viewers to actually go into the experience. Rather than just watching a documentary about a female grizzly bear (Bear 71) in her natural environment, the installation took things a step further and truly showed viewers how we coexist with wildlife in this day and age as our continued advances in technology actually allow us to distance ourselves from it.
For those unable to check it out at Sundance, you can now get a virtual walk-through of the installation and what it was like by checking out the new video after the break.

Installations like these show how Sundance is continuing to work at bringing festival goers a unique and inventive experience from filmmakers also working to the push boundaries of “normal” filmmaking. And if you find yourself in Salt Lake City between now and May 19th, you can experience the installation in person at the Utah Museum of Contemporary Art.

Snuggle up with the rest of our Sundance 2012 coverage

Trailer for ‘Take This Waltz’: Michelle Williams Succumbs to Moments in Marital Drama

$
0
0

It will be perhaps my greatest cinematic accomplishment of the summer if I can somehow manage to walk out of a viewing of Sarah Polley‘s Take This Waltz without feeling an abject loathing for Michelle Williams. Even now, watching the film’s longest trailer to date, I am filled with a deep, hissing hatred for her character, Margot. That is actually a good thing – it shows just how effective even a monologue- and music-heavy piece of marketing for the film can be, setting the stage for a big, gorgeous, moving film.

Polley’s latest film stars Williams and Seth Rogen as seemingly happy married couple Margot and Lou. But when Margot meets a handsome new dude (Luke Kirby) who, oops!, just so happens to live next door to the pair, all bets are off and Margot struggles against her deep and unresolved desires for Kirby’s Daniel. Surprise – she doesn’t succeed, “succumbing to the moments” that this monologue skirts around.

Think about the meaning of wedding vows and check out the trailer for Take This Waltz after the break.

While the film’s official synopsis doesn’t tell us much more beyond what we already know, it’s important to note the way in which this familiar knowledge is presented – which is to say, sympathetic to Margot and her desires:

“When Margot, 28, meets Daniel, their chemistry is intense and immediate. But Margot suppresses her sudden attraction: she is happily married to Lou, a celebrated cookbook writer. When Margot learns that Daniel lives across the street from them, the certainty about her domestic life shatters. She and Daniel steal moments throughout the steaming Toronto summer, their eroticism heightened by their restraint. Margot finally gives in to desire and in doing so, discovers some unsettling truths about herself. Swelteringly hot, bright and colorful like a bowl of fruit, Take This Waltz leads us, laughing, through the familiar but uncharted question of what long-term relationships do to love, sex, and our images of ourselves.”

Take This Waltz is currently slated for a limited release on June 29th. [/Film]

Abel Ferrara and Gérard Depardieu to Dramatize the Dominique Strauss-Kahn Sex Scandal

$
0
0

Director Abel Ferrara is no stranger to making movies about creeps – he did direct the original Bad Lieutenant after all – so he’s probably as good a choice as any to make a dramatization of the recent scandal French politician Dominique Strauss-Kahn has been involved in. For those uninitiated, Strauss-Kahn (or DSK, as the French adorably refer to him) was the former director of the International Monetary Fund and had a pretty high profile campaign for the French presidency running before he was arrested in New York for allegedly sexually assaulting a hotel maid. A sexual encounter between the two was confirmed, but exactly how consensual it really got was never revealed, and eventually the case was dismissed; not before the incident garnered a tidal wave of media attention and derailed the man’s political career, however.

Anyway, on to the movie news. Ferrara has told Le Monde that his next film will be a dramatization of the incident starring Gérard Depardieu as the politician and Isabelle Adjani as his very angry wife. It will be filmed in New York, Washington, and France, places that Ferrara describes as being “all spots of power.” In an interview on Ferrara’s site screenwriter Chris Zois said that the movie is, “really going to talk about the relationship between two people – two people who are larger than life, but in many ways very much like ordinary people under stress.”

Ferrara’s producer, Vincent Maraval, says that this film isn’t yet confirmed, and that really Ferrara has around four different projects he’s looking at doing next, but Ferrara assured Le Monde that, “Vincent doesn’t want to talk about the project, that’s normal, he’s the producer. But I’m the director! No one can stop me from talking about my movie.” So there you have it, get ready to see Depardieu getting creepy on a maid in a movie that sounds like it’s going to be busting some pretty high profile balls. [via The New York Times]

Redbox Moves to Take Over the Home Video Market

$
0
0

Redbox kiosks have their good points and their bad points. On the one hand, you can’t beat renting newish home video releases for just a buck a night. That price beats any of the brick and mortar video stores and any of the VOD services that are baked into people’s home electronics. But, on the other hand, I kind of see them as the multiplex of the home video industry. By putting brick and mortar video stores out of business while offering a much more limited selection, they’re just reinforcing the idea in the moviegoing public’s mind that there are only two or three huge movies out that are worth paying attention to at any given time, indie and art films be damned.

Still, you can’t beat that price, so Redbox’s parent company Coinstar has seen profits grow and their stock prices soar over the past couple of years. And now that things have gone so well, Coinstar is looking to capitalize on that success by making moves to take over the entire home video landscape. Dueling reports on Redbox activity have hit the financial world today, and both could have big impacts on the future of how we watch movies at home.

Perhaps the biggest story is that Redbox and Verizon have announced that they are teaming up on a new video streaming service that looks to take on subscription titan Netflix. Set to launch sometime in the second half of 2012, the two companies say their new venture will provide “subscription services and more in an easy-to-use, flexible and affordable service that will allow all consumers across the U.S. to enjoy the new and popular entertainment they want, whenever they choose, using the media and devices they prefer.”

Almost concurrent to the Verizon announcement comes word that Coinstar has agreed to buy NCR, the company that makes the Blockbuster Express kiosks that serve as Redbox’s chief rival. Blockbuster, which is now owned by Dish Network, have never owned their own DVD distribution machines, and instead have been licensing their name to NCR this whole time. Coinstar will reportedly pay $100 million for NCR “hardware, software, and service,” so one can imagine that it will only be a matter of time before all of the blue Blockbuster Express kiosks around the country suddenly get a red makeover.

While details about the streaming service and whether or not Redbox will be able to instantly get rid of the Blockbuster name on their new machines aren’t yet available, I can’t see these two stories happening at the same time being seen as anything other than a stake aimed directly at the hearts of Netflix and Blockbuster, and as a play by Redbox to take over all aspects of the home video industry. The question I have to ask is, with a new streaming service and a lot more kiosk locations, does this mean Redbox has plans to diversify the titles that they offer the public in a given week, or are we going to see the model of everyone watching the same three movies at the same time become even more prevalent? That, dear friends, is a scary thought. [Forbes, Forbes]

Movie News After Dark: Community Goes Street Fighter, Jean Dujardin Gets Naughty and The Magic of Hugo

$
0
0

What is Movie News After Dark? It’s a nightly collection of movie and television news that throws caution to the wind, but never ever pees into the wind. That’s just not smart, friends.

We begin this evening and this week with artist Kinjamin’s depiction of the Community cast as the characters from Street Fighter. It was found via Twitter, as posted by the show’s executive producer Dan Harmon. Needless to say, it’s inspired. So inspired, perhaps, that it makes us hope that Harmon is writing this one down. How about a Street Fighter episode in season four? Hey NBC, how about a season four?

Tonight in incredible movie news, The Raid director Gareth Evans has an idea for a sequel. An idea that actually predates The Raid and is tied in directly to the Sundance smash’s events. I haven’t seen The Raid, but I want a sequel. That’s no different than saying that I’ve not seen the nude form of model Miranda Kerr. But if they wanted to clone her, I’d be okay with that. As a man.

Tonight in stories that relate to gorgeous nude forms, Boardwalk Empire isn’t bringing Paz de la Huerta back. Which is just fine, as her character hasn’t been relevant to the core emotional storylines of the show (ie. the stuff that happens around Nucky) since season one. We’ll always have season one, Ms. de la Huerta.

Tonight in news that relates to Eastern European kinkiness, the “sexually raw” Serbian drama Klip won big at the Rotterdam Film Festival this past week. If it’s anything like the sexually explicit films we’ve seen from Serbia in recent years, then it will be worth seeing then washing out your eyes with battery acid.

Tonight in other news that oozes sexuality in a way that only a Frenchman in between two slender legs can, Oscar-nominated actor Jean Dujardin is taking some heat over the temperature of the ads for his upcoming film Les Infideles, which I believe means The Infidels. Those damn French are so uptight.

Tonight in news related to the Super Bowl, Paste counts down the 5 best (and 4 worst) Super Bowl halftime performances, complete with Slash and the Black Eyed Peas narrowly defeating Janet Jackson’s breast for one of the titles.

Tonight in Oscar predictory news, Rango took Best Animated Film at The Annie Awards, an annual party thrown by the International Animated Film Society. The Simpsons won best animated television show.

Tonight in quotable quotes, “More than 60% of the 2 billion-plus hours of video streamed by Netflix subscribers during the fourth quarter of 2011 originated on the small screen.” That’s a jarring, but not exactly surprising statistic from a recent LA Times piece about Netflix and its users.

Tonight in great reads, James Rocchi writes about how Sundance got its edge back.

Tonight in things that will drive you into a murderous rage, George Lucas talks about adding a digital Yoda to The Phantom Menace. Speaking of which, who’s going to be dressing up for the midnight show on Thursday? Anyone? Bueller?

Tonight in great finds that relate to my obsession with movie art brought upon by my decoration of my new home office, someone has put together a collection of 25 Pixel Perfect Retro Posters by Eric Tan. If anyone has a beat on where I can score the Wall-E “Brighter Future” poster or the X-Men print, I’d be willing to give up at least one of my less usable internal organs.

Tonight in innovative thoughts that might turn out to be interesting, Chicago-based film blog F This Movie! held a Twitter-based film festival. It was basically a live-blogging extravaganza. Just don’t let Kevin Carr see this. That guy doesn’t need any more ways to fill up our Twitter feeds.

Tonight in closing videos, allow me to present a studio-sanctioned, but not entirely meritless featurette called “The Magic of Hugo.” It is quite magical, after all.

‘The Amazing Spider-Man’ Trailer Teases An Untold Story

$
0
0

The new trailer for Marc Webb’s Amazing Spider-Man reboot has just hit the web… and it doesn’t look bad at all! The film stars Andrew Garfield as the titular and angst-filled hero and Emma Stone as the love interest alongside Martin Sheen, Sally Field, Denis Leary, Rhys Ifans, C. Thomas Howell and Campbell Scott (and yes, probably Stan Lee). It claims to tell the “untold story” but appears to be an origin tale, so who knows what Webb and friends have up their sleeve. (Beside the web shooter I mean.)

Check out the new trailer below.

This time out Sony is revealing quite a bit more of the action, and it’s looking pretty good. The CGI still has a cartoony or glossy look about it, but I can’t quite put my finger on it. The color palette maybe? It doesn’t look bad by any means. We also get a glimpse of Spidey’s villains including Ifans as The Lizard and Leary as Girlfriend’s Dad. Both appear to be formidable foes.

It’s hard to gauge how the 3D will play solely by this trailer… so I won’t attempt a guess. I’m usually pretty indifferent to the technology anyway.

The Amazing Spider-Man opens July 3rd.

First Look: The Video Game Worlds of ‘Wreck-It Ralph’

$
0
0

In Wreck-It Ralph, a villain (voiced by John C. Reilly) whose job is to bust up 8-bit buildings finds himself longing for more. It’s just like that time Donkey Kong started writing poetry and listening to The Cure. What did you think that funky Kill Screen was all about? Exactly.

It’s a cool concept from Disney trading on nostalgia that includes multiple worlds (theoretically for Ralph to adventure through). There’s the racing game “Sugar Rush” and the space fighting game “Hero’s Duty,” and Disney has delivered the first look with three pictures (via CineHeroes).

They’re all beautiful, but that’s par for the course at Disney. Check them out for yourself:

This movie just keeps sounding cooler and cooler. Especially since Katy Perry probably lives on Sugar Rush Island (or in its clouds).

Even better, this is the feature directorial debut of Rich Moore, who has directed a ton of Simpsons and Futurama episodes. The only question is what kind of tone this flick will go for. Sarcastic and hip? Family-friendly with a little bit of adult humor?

And when will the inevitable video game tie-in be available? The people demand to destroy buildings while talking like John C. Reilly.

Do you want to see it?

 


Producers Deny ‘Blade Runner’ Will Be ‘Alien’ Prequel

$
0
0

“It is absolutely patently false that there has been any discussion about Harrison Ford being in Blade Runner. To be clear, what we are trying to do with Ridley now is go through the painstaking process of trying to break the back of the story, figure out the direction we’re going to take the movie and find a writer to work on it. The casting of the movie could not be further from our minds at this moment.”

That’s Alcon producer Andrew Kosove busting a vein to deny the previous rumor about Ford jumping aboard the forthcoming sci-fi project from Ridley Scott. So, yes, the headline is a joke, but isn’t it a bit incredible how Scott has captured our attention with Prometheus and promises of more replicants? The internet movie nerd world hasn’t seen this level of passionate/absurd argument since nipples were put on the Bat Suit. And it’s all over the distinction of whether Scott’s stories will be continuations or prequels or have the same DNA. It’s downright bizarre, because the movies will be what they are, and the only thing that will matter is if they excite us and transport us. Hopefully after they hit theaters, no one will care anymore what their label is.

As for Ford, it’s a harsh rejection from Alcon. They seem more than a bit defensive about the rumor – perhaps because it would injure their ability to craft the story, perhaps because they’re trying to avoid Ford and the credibility/baggage he would bring to the role, perhaps because they’re just generally defensive about any stories leaking early.

Or maybe the studio behind Dolphin Tale, The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants 2 and What To Expect When You’re Expecting realize they’re playing in a totally different sandbox with this one.

‘Machete Kills’: Robert Rodriguez Will Fuck With the Wrong Mexican Again

$
0
0

It’s official. In a stunning turn of events that almost certainly mean it’s Opposite Day, Robert Rodriguez will make a movie he promised he’d make. Jokes aside, Deadline Michoacan is reporting that Rodriguez has secured the financing for Machete Kills, the sequel to the absurdly ballsy action flick starring Danny Trejo.

Talks are under way to bring Trejo back on in the hopes of an April production start, and Rodriguez is pointing to the bleachers, claiming a bigger, badder movie. As proof, the second film in a planned trilogy will feature Machete as a hired gun for the government, heading into Mexico to take on a drug cartel and a vicious bad guy who plans to build a space weapon. Yes, it’s getting even deeper into spoof territory with an Austin Powers twist.

This character sure has come a long way since Spy Kids, right?

James Wan’s ‘Warren Files’ Casts Creepy Kids

$
0
0

In 2010, Patrick Wilson got haunted in Insidious. In 1999, Lili Taylor got haunted in The Haunting. Now the two are heading back into the haunted house together with Vera Farmiga and Ron Livingston in James Wan’s The Warren Files.

Now they’ll have children to look after as ghosts chase them around in New England.

According to Variety, Mackenzie Foy (Twilight) and Joey King (who will play young Talia Al Ghul in The Dark Knight Rises) have both been tapped to play young members of the based-on-real-life Perron family who claimed they were living with spirit from beyond in the 1970s. Taylor and Livingston play the adult members of the family, while Wilson and Farmiga play ghost investigators The Warrens.

So, for those keeping track, with Insidious, The Warren Files and Insidious 2, James Wan is going to be telling ghost stories for a long time.

Culture Warrior: The First Oscar-Worthy Same Sex Kiss and The Academy’s Blurry Vision of History

$
0
0

Culture Warrior

The Oscar montage reel is a genre on its own. It’s transparently demonstrative of the overall function of the Academy Awards. These montage reels summarize and make explicit what the annual ceremony attempts to accomplish writ large: to create and solidify a canon of important American films, along with a delimited understanding of their importance. Yes, the Oscars have occasionally given a voice to the indie underdog and rush through their obligatory movies-with-subtitles category, but besides the occasional screenplay nomination for a truly innovative film and the rare foreign language film that broaches through the marginal categories, the Oscars are by and large a celebration of American cinema, specifically Hollywood cinema.

During the 2006 ceremony, a moment occurred that has been seared into my memory. I haven’t been able to find a clip of it online since it aired six years ago, so I hope this isn’t wishful or inaccurate. The 2006 ceremony consisted of a spate of overtly political films, as Crash, Brokeback Mountain, Munich, Good Night and Good Luck competed for top honors, and Syriana was in the running for other awards. In likely hopes of gaining cultural capital from celebrating mainstream cinema’s rarely explored but ever-present political function, the Academy aired a self-congratulatory reel of past Oscar-nominated films that have addressed other topical social problems, from In the Heat of the Night to Philadelphia. When the lights came back and the audience applauded with anticipated decorum, host Jon Stewart then graced the stage and stated, in a perfect move of dry deflation, “…And none of those were ever problems again.”

Point taken, Mr. Stewart. In celebrating the “tackling” of social issues of Oscars’ past, the institution by association situates itself as actively involved in progressive social change rather than merely reflective of it. And in manufacturing dominant histories of Hollywood cinema through the montage reel and the canonizing function of the statue, the Oscars draw a false equivalence between “Hollywood” and “movies,” suggesting that the Academy Awards have not only recognized the most topical and socially relevant films contemporaneously with their release, but that such films come largely from the studio system. As I’ve stated elsewhere, there’s a reason you’ll see In the Heat of the Night and Brokeback Mountain in montages that celebrate narratives of racial equality and LGBTQ representation rather than John Cassavetes’s Shadows or Todd Haynes’s Poison.

But the problem of Oscar canonization is greater than the annihilation of other, marginalized but equally important works of cinema. The Oscar ceremony, and the Oscar montage in particular, creates a dominant history that limits our interpretation of and historical inquiry into Hollywood itself. Not only do the Oscars celebrate Hollywood almost exclusively, but also purport a limited interpretation of the significance of that institution.

Which brings me to the anomaly that is the first Best Picture winner, William A. Wellman’s silent film Wings (1927). Besides being a damn good film, it’s notable (as the comprehensive near-documentary The Celluloid Closet points out) for having one of the first same-sex kisses onscreen. While it’s difficult to say how the film played for audiences in 1927, Wings’s gay subtext hardly even reads subtextually now. The film follows a love triangle with two best friends fighting over Clara Bow’s character, but as Kevin Sessums summarized on his facebook page last week when linking to this post (in which the film’s nudity is also mentioned), “Neither of them shows as much love for her, however, than they do for each other.”

Wings provides a lens into the fascinating era of pre-Code Hollywood, where films were permitted to engage in subject matter that they would be barred from exploring for several decades. Pre-Code Hollywood remains an unending treat to cinephiles because it forces us to ponder what an unregulated Hollywood would have had in store for us had the Hays Code never exercised the hegemony over representation that it did. How would Hollywood history look different? And, by association, how would the films that are venerated by institutions like the Academy Awards have looked different? Would Brokeback Mountain have seemed like such a belated landmark, or simply run of the mill in this alternative Hollywood? Wings demonstrates that, even amongst the films that the Academy Awards have honored, there are still important aspects about them which are rarely acknowledged by dominant history.

You likely won’t see Wings’s same-sex kiss on any Oscar montage. By even suggesting that the first ever Oscars honored films which potentially explored more progressive content than in the decades since, this violates the dominant narrative manufactured by Hollywood/The Oscars, which purports an easily comprehendible and perfectly linear understanding of the progress of motion pictures. But the history of American movies is anything but. What other stories of film history, from Hollywood and elsewhere, are being elided by the work of the Oscar montage?

Perhaps more so than any year, 2012′s slate is inundated with films about the past. The Help reinforces Hollywood’s feel-good, whitewashed Civil Rights story. War Horse takes us back to the good old days of WWI and sweeping John Williams scores. The Tree of Life and Midnight in Paris explore the nostalgic conflict between past and present. There are even two films (Moneyball and Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close) that tell stories of the very recent past. But two films, The Artist and Hugo, are about how we understand the past through film. They serve as reminders that, over 120 years after its invention, we are still a culture whose understanding of itself is rendered largely through the moving image. And when film history is made into something accessible, simple, and quick, what histories are being left out, and what false assumptions are maintained?

Common wisdom suggests that with the progression of linear time, we experience progressive change. Technologies – and thus, quality of life – improves; unjust laws are eventually taken down in favor of a push toward equality; we become more knowledgeable as there is more to know. Basically, we assume that people of the past are not as enlightened as those privileged to live in the present. By association, we assume that movies address progressive topics in a linear fashion. But the real history of motion pictures is far more complex than this, and it doesn’t fit into the dominant, accepted narrative that persists through Oscar montages. The very first Best Picture winner should throw the history manufactured by the Oscars into deep question. What if talkies had never been invented? What if the Hays Code had never dominated over film content for the better part of Classical Hollywood history? Why do we automatically assume that audiences aren’t “ready” for certain material when a history of Hollywood on the margins suggests otherwise?

The common reaction to the Oscars is twofold: either that it’s a waste of time, or a silly but fun ritual. Either way, after years of falling ratings, it’s become acceptable to deem the Oscars inconsequential. Yet this is still a powerful institution invested in maintaining its authority. And by existing as the major awards ceremony for American films, its library of statues compels on popular culture a dominant history of the medium that follows a simplistic narrative – in other words, a history that can fit into a short montage.

The Academy Awards do not simply reflect on or preserve history. They write it, and even sometimes erase it. It’s always important, then, for multiple histories to be heard.

Share your love of movies and history with more Culture Warrior

We’re Bringing the Berlin Film Festival To You

$
0
0
So you can’t afford the plane ticket (or you’re afraid they’ll show Mr. Popper’s Penguins on your cross-Atlantic flight). So you can’t stand to wait outside in freezing temperatures. So you can’t figure out why an international film festival is showing A Prairie Home Companion in a one-film Robert Altman retrospective. So what? That’s why we here at FSR are going to do all that for you. In 24 hours, I’ll be boarding a train, and 6 hours after that I’ll arrive at the apartment where I’ll sleep on Tim League’s floor for a week, catching all of the strange, the challenging, and the Oscar-worthy films of the future right here in the cold as hell country of Fritz Lang, Werner Herzog and Uwe Boll. That’s right sports fans, it’s the Berlin International Film Festival (also affectionately known as the Berlinale). It’s my first time, so we might all feel a little pinch, but I go undaunted into the morass of venues, celebrity sightings and movies in search of the flicks that demand to be cheered and shared. Coverage starts Thursday and will head on into next week. Berlin! It’s like Cannes except colder and more Prussian! Aren’t you glad you can experience it from home?

Austin Cinematic Limits: Spirited Away With Totoro and Friends

$
0
0

Austin Cinematic Limits

Co-founded in 1985 by Hayao Miyazaki, Isao Takahata, and Toshio Suzuki, Japan’s Studio Ghibli is famous for its masterfully crafted animated films. A retrospective series of newly struck, 35mm (subtitled) prints of Studio Ghibli’s films is coming to Austin thanks to Alamo Drafthouse. Each film will screen for one week at the Alamo South Lamar, beginning with Spirited Away on February 10th. The touring retrospective is intended to build anticipation for the famed Japanese animation studio’s latest U.S. theatrical release, The Secret World of Arrietty (the directorial debut of Hiromasa Yonebayashi, co-written by Hayao Miyazaki).

If you were to ask me whom I believed to be the three greatest Japanese filmmakers of all time, my first two responses – Akira Kurosawa and Yasujirō Ozu – are all but indisputable; the question is whether or not a director of animated films, namely Miyazaki (who is by far the most prolific director on the Studio Ghibli roster), could be considered in the same high regard as Kurosawa and Ozu. To accept Miyazaki as a legitimate filmmaker, one might need to overcome the opinion that animated films are merely for kids. For example, even though Spirited Away is ranked among the top ten on BFI’s list of 50 films you should see by age 14, the film is more than just a “kids’ movie.” The narrative is light-years more mature, intricate, complex and thoughtful than most modern Hollywood dramas – and the same can be said for any of Miyazaki’s films.

Following are brief critical analyses of the four Miyazaki that are scheduled to screen at the Alamo Drafthouse. (Rumor has it that more Studio Ghibli films will be added soon to the Alamo Drafthouse calendar!)

2/10 to 2/16 – Spirited Away

Spirited Away (2001) tells the story of Chihiro, a sulky ten-year-old girl who finds herself trapped inside a strange spirit world; she must escape this existential limbo and return to reality. This serves as a metaphor for Chihiro’s transition into adulthood. The seizure of Chihiro’s name symbolically cuts her off from childhood. Without her childhood identity, she cannot turn back; Chihiro can only progress towards adulthood. Most importantly, Chihiro must remember her childhood identity – her history – in order to become an adult.

Spirited Away functions as a critical commentary on modern Japanese society’s disregard for history. Frustrated by modern-day generational conflicts and the disintegration of traditional customs, Miyazaki waxes nostalgic for the values and ideologies of postwar era Japan. Miyazaki’s nostalgia, however, only goes so far. While the spirit world – specifically the bathhouse – is filled with Japanese traditions and fables, this representation of Japan’s past is far from societal perfection. For example, many of the inhabitants of this world are rude and discriminating; this place is also rife with corruption, excess and greed.

Spirited Away also regurgitates Miyazaki’s environmental concerns regarding pollution and over-development. The pollution inside the bathhouse is directly associated with poor ecological decisions made by Japanese society. Similar to the process Chihiro must undergo to return the real world, Miyazaki suggests that Japan’s cultural recovery requires a renewed comprehension of history, a more coherent identity, deep spiritual cleansing and – above all – sacrifice.

Spirited Away could easily be interpreted as anti-Capitalist; though it is much more likely that Miyazaki intends for it to serve as a cautionary tale, not a condemnation. The abandoned fairground represents the recent failure of the “bubble economy” that was perpetuated by Japan’s over-anxious approach to Capitalism; just as the credit card crazed gluttony of Chihiro’s parents literally transforms them into [Capitalist] pigs. It is worth noting that Miyazaki is not just talking out of his ass, he holds degrees in political science and economics from Gakushuin University.

2/17 to 2/23 – Castle in the Sky

Within the backstory of Castle in the Sky (1986), we learn that human civilizations once built flying cities which were subsequently ruined and the survivors have since been relegated to live on the ground again. One city, Laputa (not to be confused with the Spanish phrase “la puta“), clandestinely remains in the sky. (Laputa is a non-discreet reference to the flying island in Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels.) This is as good of a time as any to note that Miyazaki’s father was the director of Miyazaki Airplane, which built rudders for the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service’s Zero fighter aircrafts during World War II. Growing up around airplanes had a profound influence on Miyazaki – flight technology is a recurring theme in his films.

Sheeta is a young, orphan girl who has been inexplicably arrested by the government. The government airship on which she is being transported is attacked by sky pirates. She escapes through a window but falls; miraculously, a pendant that she recently came into possession of allows her to float in the air. A young, orphan boy named Pazu witnesses Sheeta floating; he catches her, and takes her back to his home where he is constructing a flying machine in the hopes of finding Laputa.

Laputa is a very complex place, one that at first appears idyllic but is revealed to have a menacing underbelly. Miyazaki associates Laputa’s history with Biblical events and the epic Hindu text Ramayana, and stresses the significance of history and ancestry in understanding ourselves.

The first film created and released by Studio Ghibli, Castle in the Sky was made shortly after Miyazaki witnessed a mining strike in Wales during a research excursion. This explains Miyazaki’s sympathetic portrayal of the poor, working-class community in Castle in the Sky. Miyazaki also reveals his skepticism about science and technology when utilized as tools of progress – because there is often a direct correlation to escalating levels of violence and injustice. Miyazaki is not against technological innovation, he just does not approve of technology being used to only serve corporate interests (for example, to increase productivity and profits).

2/24 to 3/1 - My Neighbor Totoro

Serving as Miyazaki’s homage to the Western European authors whose narratives Miyazaki studied fervently, My Neighbor Totoro‘s most obvious references point to Lewis Carroll and C. S. Lewis. Mei’s fall down the hole in the camphor tree is an unmistakable nod to Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland; just as Satsuki and Mei’s ride in the Catbus alludes to Susan and Lucy’s ride on the back of Aslan in Lewis’ The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. Considering Miyazaki’s deep respect for Lewis, it is interesting to observe the role that religion plays in My Neighbor Totoro. Miyazaki carefully utilizes iconography – deities – from traditional Japanese religion to provide the audience with narrative clues; all the while, he makes it overwhelmingly clear that religion is a human construct not a natural one. The protection of the religious statues and rituals does not apply to “nature spirits” (such as the Totoros or the Catbus); nature wishes to co-exist peacefully with humans, so there is no need for protection from it.

The idyllic pastoral innocence of My Neighbor Totoro reveals Miyazaki’s yearnings for the peace and simplicity of the pre-industrialized world. My Neighbor Totoro takes place at a point in history when humans still respected nature. There is no malice to be found within the natural elements of My Neighbor Totoro, and humans have no reasons to destroy it. Despite My Neighbor Totoro‘s unwavering optimism, we of course know that this balance and tranquility will not last forever; soon Tokyo will grow, and as a direct result the surrounding landscape will change drastically.

My Neighbor Totoro (1988) was as my initial introduction to Miyazaki, and to this day it is still my favorite. (Note: Akira Kurosawa and I both list My Neighbor Totoro as one of the 100 best films of all time.) It is Miyazaki’s most personal film – Miyazaki was around the same age as Mei when his mother was hospitalized with spinal tuberculosis; yet despite the hospitalized mother, My Neighbor Totoro showcases a happy family unit in which both parents are alive (a rarity in children’s fantasy narratives) though temporarily apart.

3/2 to 3/8 - Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind

Miyazaki was 17-years old when he saw the first Japanese color animated feature, Taiji Yabushita’s Legend of the White Serpent. Yabushita’s film made a tremendous impression on Miyazaki, especially the film’s heroine with whom he admittedly fell in love. It is obvious that Miyazaki sought to shape Nausicaä – the heroine of Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind – into a character with whom the audience would fall in love. Named after the princess who rescues Odysseus in Homer’s Odyssey, Nausicaä is also loosely based upon the princess in the Japanese folktale, The Princess Who Loved Insects.

Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind is Miyazaki’s second film – his first as writer and director. The film was made before Studio Ghibli was founded, but it is considered to be the beginning of the studio (thus explaining its presence in this retrospective). Adapted from Miyazaki’s manga series of the same title, Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind introduces several of the themes that reappear in Miyazaki’s later work: ecological awareness and the human impact on the environment; a fascination with flight; pacifism; feminism; and morally ambiguous villains.

One thousand years after an apocalyptic war nearly destroyed human civilization and Earth’s ecosystem, Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind reveals that surviving human settlements are scattered throughout the Toxic Jungle (named because everything about it is lethal to humans), an ominous forest swarming with giant insects. Nausicaä is a motherless princess who travels long distances via a glider; she is a skillful fighter but also peace-loving. Nausicaä discovers that the Tolmekians intend to use an ancient weapon to annihilate the giant insects of the Toxic Jungle. All the while, Nausicaä uncovers what made the Toxic Jungle so toxic (poisons created by humans) as well as how to restore the balance between man and nature (diligent study, thorough understanding and open communication).

Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind serves as a treatise on ecological action, pacifism and feminism. The apocalyptic war alludes to World War II, specifically the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Despite the catastrophic mistakes made by humans, Miyazaki is hopeful that nature will continue to adapt and flourish. The giant insects are extremely intelligent and have developed an advanced social system; they can communicate over far distances and dedicate a lot of time towards the care of their offspring (very similar to whales). The jungle absorbs the human poisons and adapts to it; so even if humans bring about their own extinction, Miyazaki is hopeful that nature will continue to exist.

Cinematic Things To Do in Austin This Week:

2/7 – Alamo South Lamar – While living and working in Mexico, Buñuel created this entrancing portrait of a poor barrio in mid-century Mexico City, mixing Italian neo-realism with hints of surrealism. (More info)

2/8 – Alamo South Lamar – Stars and directors Tim Heidecker and Eric Wareheim will be in attendance for a preview screening of Tim and Eric’s Billion Dollar Movie. It promises to be an awesome show! (More info)

2/10 – Blue Starlite Urban Drive-In – A John Cusack double-feature of Say Anything and Grosse Pointe Blank at the Blue Starlite Urban Drive-In! (More info)

Short Film Of The Day: The Death of Traditional Animation with ‘Technological Threat’

$
0
0

Why Watch? In 1988, Pixar’s Tin Toy won the Oscar for Best Animated Short. The studio’s history after that is well known, but one of the shorts that it beat out for gold was just about as symbolic as you could ask for. Technological Threat, from Brian Jennings and Bill Kroyer, was a blend of rudimentary computer animation and hand-drawn traditional that told the story of computers taking over all the artist jobs. It predicted the future the very year that it started coming to pass.

The movie itself is an homage to Tex Avery-style cartoons, with dogs in suits trying desperately to draw while burdened by exhaustion, sneezing fits, and a need to stay hydrated. The robots, of course, don’t face the same problems, and as the room fills up with them, one dog fights back.

Of course, unlike the story, there was no beating the tide of computer animation, making this a bizarre historical object and a hand-drawn crystal ball. Plus, it was nice of them to thank Brad Bird in the credits.

What will it cost? Only 4 minutes.

Skip Work. You’ve Got Time For More Short Films.


Over/Under: ‘Brokeback Mountain’ vs. ‘Weekend’

$
0
0

Over Under - Large

Brokeback Mountain had the highest opening weekend per screen average in 2005, and it went from opening in only five theaters to playing wide all over the world by the end of its run. Then, when award season rolled around, it garnered all sorts of acclaim, getting awards for best picture from multiple outlets, Oscars for Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Director, and it even got recognition from GLAAD for being the year’s most outstanding film. Pretty much it was embraced by everyone as being groundbreaking and important, and it saved Ang Lee’s butt after he pissed everyone off by making The Hulk.

Weekend came out just this last September, but you might not remember it because not many people ended up checking it out. By the time it left theaters it had only made a domestic gross of  $484,592. Ouch. And while this movie also got some love from GLAAD, it was ignored by all of the mainstream awards shows like the Oscars and the Golden Globes. A cultural phenomenon it wasn’t.

What do they have in common?

Both of these movies depict the blossoming of a romantic relationship between two men, and they explore a few different ways one can react to realizing that you’re into other dudes. Some are insistent on being open and honest about their orientations while others wish to remain private about their personal matters. Some are completely comfortable with their sexuality while others struggle with a sense of society-instilled self loathing. And while Brokeback Mountain depicts the coming together of a couple in an environment that is completely unfriendly toward homosexuality and Weekend takes place in a more open, contemporary place, they both give us a look at the quiet moments, where we watch two people just giddy to be in love. And isn’t that just precious?

Why is Brokeback Mountain overrated?

This movie is full of gorgeous landscape photography and its Gustavo Santaolalla-composed score is so beautiful that it could have played over scenes of Jake Gyllenhaal eating a bowl of Cheerios and it would have still been heartbreaking and melancholy. So it isn’t all bad. But I have to say, in general, I really don’t like it. First off, the casting is a huge problem. Having two actors as famous as Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger play these characters was super distracting. The talk became more about how far they would go in being intimate with each other on screen than it was about the themes or crafting of the film. At every moment you’re aware that you’re watching two movie stars making big career moves and it makes it near impossible to treat their characters like real people. And both of these kids were so baby-faced when this movie came out that they look really ridiculous later on in the film when they’re asked to age a few decades. Greying temples, fright wigs, and ridiculous mustaches abound, making the third act play more like a comedy sketch than anything else. Also, what’s with Ledger playing his character like Billy Bob Thornton in Sling Blade? This is the weird performance he got so much attention for?

The bad doesn’t stop with the casting though. The biggest problem I have with this one is that it has nothing to say, no story to tell, other than an attempt to tug on our heartstrings with manufactured melodrama. Who are these characters other than suppressed desires? What are they striving for when they don’t even want to work toward a life where they could openly live together? What this movie amounts to is over two hours of watching a couple of fish out of water flopping around on the ground and dying. There’s nothing at stake, everything is shrouded in doom from the beginning. So what are we supposed to get out of it other than schadenfreude? And don’t even get me started on the third act where things take a melodramatic life-and-death turn out of nowhere. That’s when I really started rolling my eyes. What Lee and his writers don’t seem to understand is that there is enough inherent drama in any relationship to make for an interesting movie. All of the end of the world teeth-gnashing and chest-pounding that happens here wasn’t necessary to make this a worthwhile story.

And you know what else wasn’t necessary? The film’s 134 minute runtime. A half hour in, and nobody had even done anything remotely gay and I was left asking myself if this was just going to be a really boring movie about camping. With none of the characters having any goals, and there being no end to their struggles in sight, the last hour crawled by pretty slowly. It doesn’t help that the pacing is all messed up either. This story, inexplicably, takes place over the course of several decades, so we have to deal with constant jumps forward in time. Every time something semi-important happens, instead of lingering in the aftermath of the characters’ actions and dealing fully with their consequences, we get whisked away years ahead in the timeline, wiping away any dramatic tension that might have been built. The scope of this thing always keeps us at arm’s length. For a movie that’s just about two people falling in love, why wasn’t this a much more intimate tale?

Why is Weekend underpraised?

For a start, the acting is really good, and the casting is way more appropriate than the casting in Brokeback. The lead actors, Tom Cullen and Chris New, are relative newcomers, so they don’t bring any baggage to their roles. You’re never painfully aware that these are two very famous, very straight people who are just pretending to be gay, so you can focus on who the characters are and what they’re going through rather than wondering how far they’re going to be willing to go in their love scenes, and what the public reaction is going to be. Are these actors really gay men? I have no idea, but most importantly, the question didn’t cross my mind once while I was watching the film. What matters is that they both do a great job. Cullen is so good at letting vulnerability play across his face that I’m sure he has a big future playing dramatic roles. And New really impressed me playing a character who has a bunch of excitement and, perhaps, anger bubbling beneath his surface. I could see him pulling off a whole gamut of roles in coming years.

There’s actually some substance to the dialogue here as well. Cullen and New’s characters talk about more than just, “Aw hell, I wish I wasn’t so gay,” miserable bullshit. Through the course of a single weekend these characters have conversations that cover the nature of friendships and the struggle to grow as a person when you’re stuck in a static situation. They cover universal stuff like infidelity, heartbreak, and the awkwardness of your first sexual experiences, as well as gay specific topics like coming out, gay marriage, and the challenges of being friends with straight folk. This is a movie about people rather than a movie about award shows.

There’s a lot of gay sex that happens in this movie, and I’ll be honest, it made me kind of uncomfortable. While I consider myself to be a person who ranks pretty low on the sliding scale of bigotry, I still can’t sit and watch two men get hot and heavy without cringing a little. I think that’s good though. The gay sex in Brokeback is so Hollywood and homogenized that it hardly registers. This movie puts you front and center, in the middle of the intimate moments, and it forces you to confront any lingering uncomfortable feelings you may have about gayness. As a straight person who has never had a really close one-on-one relationship with a gay man, this movie felt like a look at a way of life that I’m not very familiar with. And what good are movies if not to broaden the lens with which we look at the human condition? Weekend is the sort of moviegoing experience that can be most enriching. Sure, it’s nice to use cinema as escapism, but every once in a while shouldn’t we watch a movie that corners and confronts us? That’s the sort of thing that makes us grow as people.

Evening the odds.

When stuff starts going down in Brokeback Mountain the characters go straight into anal sex. I mean, right in; hard. The first time? And all of the sex seems to be so rooted in aggression. When these guys aren’t forcefully smashing their faces together and squeezing each other’s necks in the most painful make out sessions I’ve ever seen they’re wrestling around on the ground and slapping each other in the mouth. I’ve never met gay guys that so closely resemble professional wrestlers in real life, and while I’m sure some exist, why was watching these two guys hit each other with metaphoric steel chairs considered such a poignant moment for gay/straight relations? The guys from Weekend look and feel like gay guys I’ve really known. Their lives look like how a new, budding young gay person’s life will eventually look. So doesn’t that make Weekend a much more important film for everyone to see?

Luckily for you, reading more Over/Under won’t cause you tremendous heartbreak

Valentine’s Day Will Have to Soldier On Without ‘This Means War,’ Film Pushed to Friday

$
0
0

It looks like your Valentine’s Day movie-going options might now be limited to The Vow, Journey 2: The Mysterious Island, Safe House, and maybe Rampart if you and your significant other are feeling particularly punchy, as Fox has reportedly ditched their plan to open McG‘s This Means War on the 14th (next Tuesday). Deadline Springwood reports that the studio “hasn’t seen the pic’s poor tracking pick up at all in recent days,” pushing the studio to move the picture back to a wide release date on Friday the 17th, though there will be some sneak peeks sticking around on the 14th.

What’s the issue? Well, oddly enough, Nikki Finke herself doesn’t seem to get it – her exclusive post on the matter includes lines like “I don’t get what the moviegoing public’s problem with this pic is: Chris Pine, Tom Hardy, and Reese Witherspoon are just as cool casting as Channing Tatum and Rachel McAdams” and “the film didn’t look dumb (and that’s is half the battle with this genre).”

Clearly, Finke’s got a short memory on this one – the film went through a protracted cycle of casting, with names like Sam Worthington, Seth Rogen, and Bradley Cooper all getting bandied about before Hardy and Pine finally signed on for the flick (for some, frankly, pretty strange casting – Pine is set as the smooth operator and Hardy is the good boy), and the film was lensed back in 2010. Does the moviegoing public really care about stuff like that? Typically, I’d say no, but Fox’s decision to push the film signals a lack of confidence in the picture that’s, at the very least, interesting to think about. We’ll just have to see how those weekend box office numbers shake out.

10 Truly Terrifying Horror Movie Jump Scares

$
0
0

Jump Scare

If you’re anything like me you probably would take a good psychological scarring over some dick in a mask jumping out at you any day of the week – at least when it comes to horror films. Nowadays it seems like the best is behind us when it comes to the genre, and what’s left is less a collection of disturbing concepts and more so the movie equivalent of a carnival spook house. That being said – I do like carnival spook houses – a fleeting scare is good when it’s done right. Sure, in the end these scares don’t hold a candle to say, the end of Rosemary’s Baby, but we can’t deny them either. So that’s what this list is: me sucking it up and admitting that the dick in the mask totally got me.

I should tell you that I don’t wish to demerit these films for having jump scares in them; most of them have plenty of psychological scarring as well… take number ten, for example.

10. The Thing – Chest Attack

Yikes. That’s like… the last thing you want someone’s chest to do.

First off, let me just say that Rob Bottin is amazing. He’s the special effects artist you have to thank for having the image of a mans severed head crawling around like a spider burned forever in your nightmares.

What I love about this scare is that the characters are already in a bad situation trying to save the guy’s life – and then in the blink of an eye it’s a total 360 and suddenly they are making sure he never moves ever again. It’s horrifying the first time you watch it too because you’re not really expecting a scare, let alone expecting the scare to be so… unusual. And before you can recover you are treated to a barrage of carnage so bizarre and disturbing that you’ve completely forgotten about the jump that introduced it all. The Thing is truly a spectacle of amazing practical effects, disturbing grotesque, and glorious man beards.

9. Se7en – Sloth

I can’t tell if it’s the jump that gets me here or what the jump reveals – that the tattered corpse tied to a bed isn’t a corpse but rather what remains of a guy who is currently having a very bad year. The whole scene leading up to it is bad enough when it is explained just what happened to this guy, and we realize that it is probably the worst murder of the film… But then finding out that the job isn’t even finished is down right bananas – a word I don’t easily throw around, mind you.

There’s no way to see this coming because well… why the hell would we? This isn’t a movie where corpses just come to life willy-nilly, as far as we know the rules in their world are the same as the rules to ours. Even with the cop getting way too close to the guy (who must smell awful mind you) making the situation perfect for a scare, it just doesn’t seem like that kind of film. Never would we suspect the idea that someone who looks like that guy does could possibly be alive in any capacity – which is exactly what this scare is betting on.

8. The Decent – Night Vision Creature

You know, I loved this scare but I wasn’t actually surprised by it… the reason why is because some ass decided to stick it in every preview for this film when it was coming out, making everyone who saw it thoroughly ready for the best scare moment of the entire film. I hate that – it’s like when they stuck the ending shot to Quarantine on all the movie previews and posters… did no one stop and say “Hey guys… maybe it’s not a good idea to reveal the end of our movie in all our ads…” That kind of seems like advertising 101.

Anyway – it was only years later when I watched this with a friend who hadn’t seen the previews did I witness just how good the scare is. Firstly – if they didn’t set it up so quickly you’d see it coming, but you don’t have time to realize that. Secondly they actually give you a second to see the creature without indicating it with any scare chords or anything. It’s this nice silent moment that lasts barely a second where your heart drops into your stomach, then a boom of sound and action. It’s not the most original thing in the world, but it’s very solid and perfectly timed.

7. Signs – The Pantry

I’ll probably get some shit for this one – and I wouldn’t blame anyone for it either. I’m not a huge fan of this film but I do think it has its moments – I just wish it didn’t try to be more than what it was… which goes for all of M. Night Shyamalan films, actually.

There are several moments in this film that got me – another that comes to mind is the alien arm in the basement, and also the TV reflection part… but this one really did it for me because it relied on no external sounds or music. It was that lack of scare chords that oddly enough made me jump. It felt, well… alien – off in pacing. There’s this tension buildup of trying to see what’s on the other side of this door, and then when he walks away and comes back you expect at the least a second buildup, if only for a moment. But instead we instantly get the scare without any warning and any indication in the sounds – just the natural clicking of the claws of the hand and it’s over.

6. Psycho – Meeting Mother

Psycho is a really hard film to put into perspective. Most people know the ending of the film before they’ve even seen it – that alone puts the movie at a complete disadvantage to modern audiences. So far I’ve only met one person who didn’t know the end – and when finding that out I promptly sat them down to watch it, only to have someone walk into the room and spoil the ending half way through. You can imagine my anger.

Now – obviously there is another scene I could mention here, a scene that did have audiences jumping their seats because not only was it unexpected in a fleeting sense but also because no movie had really ever just killed off their star that suddenly before. However I really think this scene is scarier as a jump, firstly because we see the killer coming in the shower scene, and secondly because this one has two reveals right after another. The initial reveal of mother’s corpse is slow but also a huge blow to the audience, and then before they can put it all together we are hit with the classic Psycho chords and our first and only sight of Norman in all his drag glory – his face deranged and desperate as he is held back from stabbing this woman to death.

It’s just so much in so little time.

This Week In DVD: February 7th

$
0
0

This Week in DVD

Welcome back to This Week in DVD! Some great, good and sadly deficient releases await you including The Sunset Limited, Knuckle, season two of Rocko’s Modern Life, the second to last Twilight film and more!

As always, if you see something you like, click on the image to buy it.

Project NIM

In the early 1970s a douchey professor at Columbia University set out on an experiment involving cross species communication by taking a young chimpanzee from its mother shortly after birth and placing it with a human family to be raised as one of their children. This documentary from director James Marsh is ostensibly about that chimp named Nim, but the people who pass in and out of his life are just as much the subjects here. Their motivations, actions and attitudes offer a smorgasbord of typical human behaviors that none of us should be proud of regardless of where you land on the issue of animal ethics, and the result is an oddly fascinating glimpse at the human psyche as interpreted by our closest living relative.

Rocko’s Modern Life: Season Two

Pitch: “I’m nauseous. I’m nauseous…”

Why Buy? Rocko is a wallaby with a handful of friends, a loyal dog and a proclivity for wacky adventures. This mid-nineties series from Nickelodeon’s heyday is a mix of crude and stylish animation that brings to life some truly hilarious and witty dialogue and happenings. This is one of those rare kids shows that offers just as much laughter and joy for adults, and it should come as no surprise that two of the main writers went on to create the equally awesome Phineas and Ferb for Disney. And am I the only one who thinks of Shout! Factory as the Criterion Collection for people who like fun? They continue to impress with their ability to pluck otherwise unavailable classics from the past and return them to life on DVD.

The Sunset Limited

Pitch: “Who would want this nightmare but for fear of the next…”

Why Buy? Samuel L Jackson and Tommy Lee Jones give brilliantly nuanced and heartfelt performances in what is essentially one ninety-minute conversation (and battle of wills) about whether or not life is something worth living. It’s been a while since I’ve truly enjoyed either actor in a movie, but this adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s play has renewed both of them in my eyes. No matter your opinion on faith, god, humanity and mankind the final result will leave you thinking, wondering and admiring these two actors at the top of their game. And thanks to dialogue snippets like “the lingering scent of divinity” it may also be my favorite of McCarthy’s works too.

3

Pitch: “Who ordered the German threesome?” – overheard during Cole Abaius’ trip to Berlinale…

Why Rent? A couple find themselves in the doldrums of their relationship and both begin affairs, but unbeknownst to anyone involved both of them are sleeping with the same man. Tom Twyker’s latest film is an interesting, humorous, and often sad drama about love lost and found, life and death, and what it means to be whole both inside and out. The topic and presentation are both of a very adult nature as the sex is frequent and fairly explicit, but the core lessons here are universal in regard to how we relate to each other. The second act has a bit of a slowdown, but the film overall is a refreshing and engaging look at modern love.

5 Star Day

Pitch: “Convincing chemistry between its attractive leads and fine thesping” – Variety…

Why Rent? A college student (Cam Gigandet) loses his job, girlfriend and apartment on his birthday and decides to test the theory of astrology by finding and interviewing the three people born at the exact same time and place as he was. Life lessons galore ensue! This really should have been a terrible movie. That plot, the lead actor and that terrible DVD cover art made me predict that all signs pointed to crap. And yet, the story surprises by never quite going where you expect. And Gigandet doesn’t necessarily display “fine thesping” but he’s surprisingly charming and subdued.

Knuckle

Pitch: Makes up for TLC’s obnoxious My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding show…

Why Rent? Ian Palmer didn’t plan on spending more than a decade documenting the ongoing feud between two rival families of Irish “travelers” but that’s exactly what ended up happening. This documentary follows various family members through the years as the meet, brawl and move on to nurse their wounds and pride. Or in some cases ice their bloody and raw knuckles. These aren’t the kind of people you really find yourself drawn to, but they’re an engaging and charismatic lot all the same. What drives real people to basically become living, breathing Hatfield & McCoys? Not even they know apparently.

The Phantom of the Opera At the Royal Albert Hall

Pitch: Anyone else remember Phantom of the Mall? No? Just me? Okay, moving on…

Why Rent? Andrew Lloyd Webber’s most famous (arguably) stage production received a special 25th anniversary presentation at London’s Royal Albert Hall, but in honor of the occasion producer Cameron Mackintosh made a few tweaks. I’m not a big musical fan, but this is easily one of my three favorites (along with Wicked and Les Miserables), and while watching a disc cannot really compare to the live experience this is still a sumptuously beautiful production. Crank the volume up andyou can’t help but get swept into the emotion of the story and songs. Yes, I’m serious.

The Rebound

Pitch: It’s Michael Douglas’ wife and the fourth guy from The Hangover movies! You should give it a chance anyway…

Why Rent? A middle aged woman (Catherine Zeta-Jones) leaves her cheating husband and moves to the big city where she discovers self worth and a nice guy almost half her age (Justin Bartha). As middling romantic comedies go this one is not too shabby. Glowing endorsement! Zeta-Jones and Bartha do good, relaxed work here and manage solid charisma and chemistry. They both manage to earn some laughs too with their delivery of writer/director Bart FreundLich’s script. Recommended for fans of either actor or the thrill of decent direct to DVD releases.

Yakuza Weapon

Pitch: The most powerful and visually appealing weapon in the movie is a very sexy, naked and comatose Japanese woman…

Why Rent? The son of a Yakuza boss returns home to claim his seat at the head of the crime family, but not everyone welcomes him back. From my full review: “It’s not quite interested enough to seriously dissect the manly action hero dynamic, but it pokes more than a few jabs at it including the ex-girlfriend character, Nayoko, who throws a boat at him out of feminine rage. Yes, a boat. She’s the only one able to beat his ass, which makes it a romantic gesture when Shozo has to save her from the bad guy who kidnaps her, dresses her up like schoolgirl, and then threatens her with a motorized dildo. So if nothing else I’ve described has quite sold you on the movie…”

Stormhouse

Pitch: More of a light sprinkle really…

Why Avoid? A female ghost mumblerer heads to a military base to study the supernatural entity they have incarcerated there. Surprise! It gets out. The idea here is pretty sound, but the execution is frustratingly bad. I realize there’s a global recession going on, but if you’re going to maintain a base containing a dangerous creature you might want to turn on some goddamn lights. Not only is the incessant darkness dangerous to your soldiers, but it’s also a bland and annoying watch for viewers. Of course, the creature effects consisting of lights and sound effects don’t help either. Not scary, not interesting, and not worth your time. Skip it and watch Storm Warning instead.

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1

Pitch: Cruel of me to tease you with this I know. It doesn’t actually release until Friday night at midnight…

Why Avoid? The penultimate film in the Twilight Saga sees the pale Edward (Robert Pattinson) and the weak-willed Bella (Kristen Stewart) wed, screw and welcome their toothy spawn into the world. There’s also a puppy dog following them around. It may be difficult to tell, but I’m no fan of the Twilight series. Even if it wasn’t insulting to girls, which it is at every opportunity, the story alternates between two modes… boring and stupid. The teen angst is overly melodramatic, the lessons and morality are ignorant, and the action is dull. And good god how does a billion dollar franchise end up with such amateur-looking CGI effects? Skip it and watch Breaking Away instead.

A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas

Pitch: It’s a sad state of affairs when not even a shower scene with hot, naked nuns can make a movie worth recommending…

Why Avoid? The third (and probably final) film in the Harold & Kumar franchise sees the two best friends as virtual strangers. Harold has grown up and become an adult while Kumar is still an immature and unfunny asshole. Then stuff happens and they reunite. I’m a fan of the first two movies, but aside from the nude nun-filled shower scene and Neil Patrick Harris this one is mostly a laugh and thrill free dud. Sadly, even Harris’ “character” jumps the shark in a scene where attempts to sexually assault a woman in a fairly rough manner. It crosses a line from funny to simply crude, and that pretty much sums up the film as a whole. Skip it and watch one of the first two instead.

Also out this week, but I haven’t seen the movie/TV show and review material was unavailable:

Anonymous
Fireflies In the Garden
Machete Joe
Poolboy: Drowning Out the Fury
The Reunion
Supershark

Read More: This Week in DVD

What are you buying on DVD this week?

Amy Adams Will Be ‘An Object of Beauty’ for Steve Martin Adaptation

$
0
0

Steve Martin‘s talents extend far beyond just stand-up comedy, acting, sombrero-wearing, and banjo-playing, as the multi-hyphenate has also dabbled in the writing world, including a swim with fiction with three novels (fine, “Shopgirl” was a novella). That first novel(la) was turned into a film back in 2005, and now Martin’s latest work of grown-up fiction will join it on the big screen.

An Object of Beauty will be based on Martin’s 2010 novel of the same name, and the project is now getting outfitted with not only three producers, but an Oscar-nominated star. Amy Adams will lead the film as central character Lacey Yeager, as well as producing it alongside Maven Pictures producers Trudie Styler and Celine Rattray. There’s no word yet on the rest of the film’s cast and crew, including whether or not Martin will adapt his own book for the big screen (as he did with Shopgirl).

Adams’ producer duties prove that she’s got more than just a passing interest in the role – which is of particular note, as the complicated character of Lacey is quite distant from the sunny, smiling image that Adams has cultivated over the past few years (The Fighter notwithstanding). Martin’s book focuses squarely on Lacey, a go-getter in the New York art world who starts off as a plucky intern at Sotheby’s, before some questionable choices (both in terms of career advancement and actual legality) force her to reinvent herself as a gallery owner. Told through the narrative voice of a male friend of Lacey’s, the book also focuses on Lacey’s checkered romantic life, littered with men who shape her career in different ways. While Lacey would be hard to classify as a “likable” leading lady, she’s compelling to read about, and the book is a well-crafted read that flies right by.

There’s little on Adams’ existing resume that’s comparable to the Lacey role – she’s plucky, not sunny, and though she’s gritty and determined, she make some incredibly poor and stupid choices (though, oddly enough, she’s not sympathetic), and she trades on her good looks and sex appeal more often than she defers to her (quite solid) intellect. If Adams pulls it off, Lacey will be a solid departure for her, and a real feather in her acting cap.

Adams will next be seen in Man of Steel as another headstrong female character, Lois Lane. [THR, via ComingSoon]

 

 

Viewing all 22121 articles
Browse latest View live